MakeVisual no-code platform for building AI-powered automations, workflows, and agents.

4.2 (6)

Reviewed by Daniel Nikulshyn·Updated May 2026

No-Code Automation Workflow AI Agents Integrations Visual Builder LLM

Overview

Make is a visual automation platform that lets users connect apps, data, and AI models through a drag-and-drop interface. Instead of writing code, you map out scenarios on a canvas, linking triggers and actions across thousands of services to automate repetitive tasks and complex workflows. The platform supports AI-driven workflows and smart agents, allowing teams to integrate large language models, generate content, process documents, and orchestrate decision-making steps. It is used by individuals, startups, and enterprises to streamline operations across marketing, sales, IT, and customer support. Make offers a free tier and scales with paid plans based on operation volume, making it accessible for solo builders while supporting production workloads for larger organizations.

Key features

Visual scenario canvas
Thousands of pre-built app connectors
AI and LLM integrations
Smart agent and workflow orchestration
Scheduling, webhooks, and error handling
Template library and team collaboration

Pricing

Model: Free
Category: AI Agents Platform
Rating: 4.2 / 5 (6)

Use cases

Automate Marketing Workflows

Connect marketing tools to automate lead routing, content generation with LLMs, and multi-step campaign tasks on a visual canvas without writing code.

AI-Powered Document Processing

Build scenarios that ingest documents, extract data using AI models, and route results to downstream apps like CRMs or spreadsheets automatically.

Customer Support Orchestration

Create smart agents that triage tickets, draft responses with AI, and trigger actions across helpdesk, chat, and internal tools to speed up resolutions.

Cross-App Sales Operations

Sync data between sales platforms, enrich leads, and automate follow-ups using pre-built connectors and scheduled triggers to streamline pipelines.

Pros & Cons

Pros

Intuitive drag-and-drop visual builder
Large library of app integrations
Supports AI models and custom agents
Flexible pricing including a free tier
Reusable templates speed up setup

Cons

Complex scenarios can be hard to debug
Operation-based pricing adds up at scale
Learning curve for advanced logic

Reviews

4.2

Average from 6 ratings.

Elena Rossi

May 27, 2026

Does the job

Pretty happy overall. Template library and team collaboration just works and flexible pricing including a free tier. Operation-based pricing adds up at scale can be annoying, but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.

Liam O’Connor

Oct 19, 2025

Does the job

Pretty happy overall. Scheduling, webhooks, and error handling just works and flexible pricing including a free tier. but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.

Olga Ivanova

Sep 30, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and large library of app integrations. Scheduling, webhooks, and error handling fits neatly into how we already work, and template library and team collaboration removed a step we used to do by hand. Complex scenarios can be hard to debug, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.

Camille Laurent

Sep 26, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and flexible pricing including a free tier. Thousands of pre-built app connectors fits neatly into how we already work, and scheduling, webhooks, and error handling removed a step we used to do by hand. Learning curve for advanced logic, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.

Daniel Schmidt

Aug 24, 2025

Does the job

Pretty happy overall. AI and LLM integrations just works and reusable templates speed up setup. Learning curve for advanced logic can be annoying, but no dealbreakers — I'd recommend it to a friend without hesitating.

Carlos Mendoza

Jun 20, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and intuitive drag-and-drop visual builder. Scheduling, webhooks, and error handling fits neatly into how we already work, and template library and team collaboration removed a step we used to do by hand. Complex scenarios can be hard to debug, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.

Q&A

What are the main challenges when building complex automations in Make?

While the drag‑and‑drop interface is intuitive, highly complex scenarios can be difficult to debug because error handling and step tracing are visual rather than code‑based. Additionally, operation‑based pricing may increase costs quickly if the workflow runs at high frequency or processes large data volumes.

Asked by Henrik Dahl · Jun 4, 2026

How can I incorporate AI or large language models into my workflows?

Make’s visual canvas lets you add AI steps by connecting to LLM providers or custom models. You can generate text, summarize documents, or build decision‑making agents directly within a scenario, chaining the AI output to subsequent actions like sending emails or updating databases.

Asked by Salome Beridze · May 29, 2026

What kind of app integrations does Make provide and can I connect custom APIs?

Make includes thousands of pre‑built connectors for popular SaaS tools across marketing, sales, IT, and support. For services not listed, you can use HTTP modules, webhooks, or custom API calls to integrate any RESTful endpoint, allowing you to extend the platform beyond the native library.

Asked by Ola Eriksen · May 18, 2026

How does Make’s pricing work and what’s included in the free tier?

Make offers a free tier that lets you build and run scenarios with a limited number of operations per month. Paid plans are billed based on the volume of operations you execute, so you pay more as your automations run more frequently. This model scales from solo builders to enterprise workloads.

Asked by Sanjay Gupta · May 10, 2026