Claude Code Telegram Bot一个开源的 Telegram 机器人，提供基于聊天的远程访问 Claude Code，具备每个项目的会话持久性和安全的目录沙盒。

4.7 (6)

审阅者 Daniel Nikulshyn·更新 2026年6月

Telegram Bot Developer Tools Chat Interface Remote Access Session Management Sandboxing Open Source

概览

Claude Code Telegram Bot 是一个开源的机器人，提供基于聊天的远程访问 Claude Code，具备每个项目的会话持久性和安全的目录沙盒。它允许用户自然地与 Claude 交互，请求分析、编辑或解释代码，而无需编写终端命令。机器人会在对话中保持上下文，使用户能够通过 Telegram 在任何地方处理代码库，接收主动通知，并通过内置身份验证、目录沙盒和审计日志保持安全。

主要功能

对话式交互的代理模式
每个项目的自动会话持久性
安全的代码分析的目录沙盒
来自 webhook 和 CI/CD 事件的主动通知
内置身份验证和审计日志

价格

模型: Free
分类: 编译导为
评分: 4.7 / 5 (6)

使用场景

通过手机远程编程

通过 Telegram 访问 Claude Code，以在移动设备上审查、编辑或生成代码，无需桌面终端。

每个项目的会话连续性

为每个项目维护独立的持久会话，以便在对话中保持上下文和历史记录的隔离和可恢复。

安全的沙盒代码执行

在目录沙盒约束内运行 Claude Code 命令，以防止在批准的项目文件夹之外进行意外文件访问。

自托管的团队 AI 助手

在您自己的基础设施上部署开源机器人，为团队提供基于聊天的访问 Claude Code 的功能，并完全控制数据。

优点 & 缺点

优点

提供对 Claude Code 的基于聊天的远程访问
保持每个项目的会话持久性
具备目录沙盒功能，安全分析代码
支持自然对话格式

缺点

可能需要手动设置和配置
依赖 Telegram 和 Claude Code 集成
仅限于拥有 Telegram 帐户的用户

对决战绩

在万神殿中参与了 4 对决。

第1

第2

第3

Last 4 battles

评测

4.7

6 个评分的平均值。

登录以留下评测。

Elena Rossi

May 21, 2026

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: the onboarding and support is responsive. On balance the feature set — especially the API — justifies the 5 stars for our use case.

Marcus Bell

Nov 2, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and the value for money is strong. The integrations fits neatly into how we already work, and the core workflow removed a step we used to do by hand. The docs could be deeper, which is the main caveat, but it has held up under daily use.

Victor Nguyen

Oct 19, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and it is genuinely easy to set up. The integrations fits neatly into how we already work, and the integrations removed a step we used to do by hand. but it has held up under daily use.

Pierre Dubois

Oct 10, 2025

Solid for our team

We rolled this out across the team last quarter and it saves real time. The automation fits neatly into how we already work, and the core workflow removed a step we used to do by hand. but it has held up under daily use.

Kwame Mensah

Jul 28, 2025

Compared a few options

Evaluated this against two competitors. Where it wins: the API and support is responsive. Where it lags: the mobile experience lags. On balance the feature set — especially the onboarding — justifies the 4 stars for our use case.

Gunnar Eriksson

Jul 9, 2025

Use it every day

Honestly didn't expect to like it this much. The onboarding is exactly what I needed, and support is responsive. I do wish the docs could be deeper, but I reach for it almost every day now and it just clicks.