Question 1

Can I use this alongside other Claude Code plugins?

Accepted Answer

Yes. SupaConductor uses the /orchestrator-supaconductor: namespace and doesn't conflict with any other plugins, built-in commands, or MCP servers.

Question 2

Is this overkill for small tasks?

Accepted Answer

For a quick one-file fix — yes, just use Claude Code directly. Use SupaConductor when: The work touches 3 or more files You'd normally plan before coding You want automated quality checks You want the work done right the first time You can also use individual commands without the full loop:

Question 3

これらはCursor、Windsurf、または他のAIツールと連携しますか？

Accepted Answer

いいえ。SupaConductorはClaude Codeのプラグインであり、Claude Codeのプラグインシステム（エージェント、スキル、スラッシュコマンド、フック）が必要です。ただし、生成されるconductor/ディレクトリはMarkdownファイルです。任意のAIツールがそれらを読むことができます。SupaConductorで始めて後からツールを切り替えても、仕様、計画、ドキュメントは有用なままです。

Question 4

How much of my context window does this use?

Accepted Answer

Skills use progressive disclosure — only ~100 tokens each for metadata. Full instructions load only when activated (typically under 5,000 tokens each). The 39 skills are not loaded all at once. Agents run as separate conversations with their own context windows, so they don't fill up your main conversation. | Component | Context Used | When | |-----------|-------------|------| | Orchestrator | ~4,000 tokens | Active during /go | | Planner | ~3,000 tokens | During planning only | | Evaluator | ~2,500 tokens each | Only the active evaluator loads | | Board meeting | ~5,000 tokens | On-demand only | | Idle | ~500 tokens | Between steps |

Question 5

How much does this cost in API credits?

Accepted Answer

SupaConductor uses the same Claude API as normal Claude Code — it just structures the work more carefully. Because it runs multiple agents (planning, execution, evaluation), it uses roughly 3-5x the API calls compared to doing everything manually in one conversation. SupaConductor optimizes costs automatically: it uses Opus (the most capable model) for planning and evaluation, and Sonnet (faster, cheaper) for execution tasks. Ways to reduce cost: Use /orchestrator-supaconductor:implement if you write specs yourself Skip board meetings for small features (they're opt-in) Use human-in-the-loop mode to stay in control of scope

Question 6

Do I need to know how to code?

Accepted Answer

You need Claude Code installed and running — that requires basic terminal knowledge. But once SupaConductor is set up, you describe what you want in plain English and it handles the implementation.

Question 7

What gets created in your project

Accepted Answer

When you run /orchestrator-supaconductor:setup, it creates a conductor/ folder: All of these are plain Markdown and JSON files. You can read, edit, or delete them anytime.

Question 8

How It Works

Accepted Answer

すべての作業は、Evaluate-Loop と呼ばれる構造化されたサイクルに従います。| ステップ | 発生すること | |------|-------------| | Plan | 目標をタスクに分解し、依存関係グラフを作成 | | Evaluate Plan | スコープの問題、他の作業との重複、実現可能性をチェック | | Execute | コードを書き、テストを実行し、進捗を追跡 — 可能な限り並列で | | Evaluate Execution | 専門チェックが UI/UX、コード品質、統合、ビジネスロジックをレビュー | | Fix | 失敗を修正し、評価に戻る（最大5回の修正サイクル、最大3回の計画修正） | | Complete | すべてのチェックが通過—タスクが完了とマーク | このループは完全に自動化されます。すべての品質チェックに合格するか、入力が必要になるまで続きます。

Question 9

What's Inside

Accepted Answer

| Component | Count | What It Does | |-----------|------:|-------------| | Commands | 36 | Slash commands you type to control everything | | Skills | 39 | Specialized knowledge modules that activate when needed | | Agents | 15 | Autonomous workers that handle planning, coding, and evaluation | | Evaluators | 4 | Quality checkers for UI/UX, code quality, integrations, and business logic | | Board of Directors | 5 | Virtual executives who deliberate on major decisions | | Lead Engineers | 4 | Architecture, Product, Tech, and QA specialists | Bund​les Superpowers v4.3.0 (MIT) — everything works out of the box with zero setup.

Question 10

What Does This Do?

Accepted Answer

You tell Claude Code what you want. SupaConductor figures out how to build it — step by step, with quality checks at every stage. Without SupaConductor, you prompt Claude Code and hope for the best. You manually review, re-prompt, and fix what it misses. With SupaConductor, you type one command: And it automatically: 1. Writes a detailed specification 2. Creates an implementation plan with task dependencies 3. Executes each task (in parallel when possible) 4. Checks the work with specialized evaluators 5. Fixes any issues it finds 6. Marks the work complete when everything passes No babysitting. No re-prompting. Just describe what you want and walk away.

Dispatching Parallel Agents (Grade A)セキュリティテスト済みデータ-AIスキル for Claude AI。ランクA。複数の独立したタスクがある場合、共有状態や順次依存関係を必要としないときは使用します。

概要

主な機能

料金

ユースケース

複数のテストファイルにおける失敗

独立したサブシステムの問題

メリット & デメリット

メリット

デメリット

レビュー

Q&A

質問する

東学サェソーの代替

Manage Headers (Grade A)

Using Git Worktrees (Grade A)

Ga4 Bigquery Schema (Grade A)

Meta Capi (Grade A)

Callees (Grade A)

Test Module Name (Grade A)

Board Of Directors (Grade A)

Advpl Mvc Avancado (Grade A)

概要